benchmark.darvinyi.com

Leaderboard

All models × all benchmarks. Green cells = near max score for that benchmark.

Top score
Mid range
Lower score
— = no data
ModelSWE-benchHumanEval / HumanEval+LiveCodeBenchSWE-LancerMATH BenchmarkAIMEGSM8KGPQA DiamondBIG-Bench HardTruthfulQAARC-ChallengeHellaSwagMMLU / MMLU-Proτ-bench (tau-bench)WebArena / VisualWebArenaAgentBenchTheAgentCompanyGAIASW-A²-BenchLMSYS Chatbot ArenaLiveBenchVS-Bench (Visual Strategic Bench)WorldBench
GPT-5OpenAI
74.9%v
96.9%v
~79%v
66.3%v
~95%+v
94.6%v
99.7%v
85.7%v
~91%v
~75%v
~97%v
96.4%v
93.0%v
~79%
58.1%
6.8
~24%
67.0%v
—
~1426 Elo
~82%
——
Opus 4.5Anthropic
80.9%
95.7%v
87.1%
—
~97%v
92.77%v
~98.5%v
87.0%v
93.1%
~78%v
~96.5%v
~96%v
90.8%v
~56%
71.6%
~6.2
—
~57%
—
~1468 Elo
~79%
——
GPT-4oOpenAI
———
~9%
76.6%v
~11%v
96.1%v
74.8%v
~83%
~69%
~96%v
95.7%v
88.7%v
~25%
14.41%
4.27
8.6%
~15%
—
~1345 Elo
~53%
——
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
67.2% (multi)v
94.2%v
———
88.0%v
~98%v
86.4%v
89.2%
———
89.2%v
~48%
~48%
—
30.3%
~52%
—
1448 Elo
~76%
83.4%
—
Llama 4 MaverickMeta
OSS
—
88.5%v
——
88.9%v
—
~95%v
69.8%v
~85%v
~62%v
92.3%v
~95%v
87.8%v
———
~7.4%
——
~1417 Elo
~67%
——
Sonnet 4Anthropic
72.7%v
——
26.2%
97.2%v
——
75.4%v
93.1%
~72%v
———
84.7%
~42%
~5.2
26.3%
——
~1410 Elo
———
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
OSS
42.0%v
90.2%v
——
90.2%v
——
59.1%v
~87%v
~60%
95.2%v
95.8%v
88.2%v
——
~4.5
———
~1363 Elo
———
Qwen 3 72BAlibaba
OSS
—
92.7%v
83.6%v
—
96.4%v
79.2%v
~97%v
~78%v
~88%v
—
~94%v
~95%v
88.7%v
———————
~73%
——
o3OpenAI
69.1%v
——
37.3%v
~97%v
96.7%v
99.2%v
87.7%v
——
98.1%v
————————
~1411 Elo
—
84.9%
—
DeepSeek R1DeepSeek
OSS
49.2%v
—
87.1%v
—
97.3%v
79.8%v
97.7%v
71.5%v
————
90.8%v
———————
~72%
——
o4-miniOpenAI
68.1%v
97.6%v
85.9%v
—
~96%v
93.4%v
—
81.4%v
————————————
87.3%
——
Opus 4.6Anthropic
80.8%
———
~97–98%v
99.79%v
—
91.3%v
————
~90.8%v
——————
1549 Elo (Coding)
———
Gemini 3 ProGoogle
——
91.7%
—
96.4%v
~93%v
—
94.3%
———————————————
Mistral Large 3Mistral
————
93.6%v
—
~93%v
——
~65%v
——
87.1%v
——————————
Grok 4xAI
—————
100% (Heavy)v
—
87.5–88.9%v
————
92.7%v
——————————
Kimi K2.6Moonshot
OSS
80.2%v
—
89.6%v
—————————
~86%v
——————————
M2.5MiniMax
OSS
80.2%v
———————————
~86.5%v
——————————
Grok 3xAI
———————————————————
1402 Elo
———
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
——————————————————————
64.0% avg accuracy
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle
——————————————————————
61.8% avg accuracy
Qwen3.5-VL-Plus (Thinking)Alibaba
——————————————————————
59.3% avg accuracy
GPT-5.4 ThinkingOpenAI
——————————————————————
58.2% avg accuracy (Thinking, high effort)
Qwen3.5-VL-27BAlibaba
——————————————————————
56.6% avg accuracy
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
——————————————————————
53.7% avg accuracy
Grok 4.2xAI
——————————————————————
53.3% avg accuracy
Qwen3.5-VL-35B-A3BAlibaba
——————————————————————
52.9% avg accuracy
Kimi K2.5Moonshot
——————————————————————
52.5% avg accuracy
Gemma 4 31BGoogle
——————————————————————
49.7% avg accuracy
Qwen3.5-VL-Plus (Instruct)Alibaba
——————————————————————
48.7% avg accuracy
GLM-4.6VOther
——————————————————————
42.5% avg accuracy
InternVL3.5Other
——————————————————————
41.2% avg accuracy
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle
——————————————————————
34.6% avg accuracy
Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic
—————————————————————
81.1%
—
GPT-4.1OpenAI
—————————————————————
80.3%
—
UI-TARS-1.5Other
—————————————————————
81.5%
—
Doubao-1.5-Thinking-ProOther
—————————————————————
74.7%
—
QVQ-MaxAlibaba
—————————————————————
74.5%
—
Qwen-VL-MaxAlibaba
—————————————————————
80.2%
—
Doubao-1.5-Vision-ProOther
—————————————————————
77.6%
—
Grok-2 VisionxAI
—————————————————————
70.2%
—
Qwen2.5-VL-72BAlibaba
—————————————————————
80.3%
—
InternVL3-78BOther
—————————————————————
74.1%
—
Llama 3.2 90B VisionMeta
—————————————————————
67.8%
—
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
——————————————————
36.9% Overall Execution SR (via Claude Code scaffold)
————
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI
——————————————————
34.5% Overall Execution SR (via Codex CLI scaffold)
————
Gpt 5 5
———————————————————————
Claude Fable 5
———————————————————————
Grok 4 5
———————————————————————
Gpt 5 6
———————————————————————
Claude Opus 4 8
———————————————————————

Scores reflect best available result per model per benchmark. v = vendor self-reported. Benchmark names truncated — click to view full details.